Positioning the Northwest as a Biotechnology Leader
Finding solutions to the challenges that face Washington
by Lee Cheatham, Executive Director, Washington Technology Center
Biotechnology will be a dominant force in the 21st century—a force
that not only drives the economy of the Pacific Northwest, but regional
and national economies around the globe.
But our region faces challenges. How effectively we deal with these challenges
makes all the difference whether we realize the advantages of a leadership
position or suffer mediocrity.
Challenge #1: Ensure more available capital flows into our local companies.
Let’s be clear. There is a shortage of available seed capital—those
early stage investments of $50,000 to $500,000. The success of venture
investment funds over the past decade has meant they simply can’t
afford the effort to invest in small amounts. Angel investors are a great
source for this seed level investment, but they are difficult to find.
More than three years ago, WTC recognized this lack of capital as a critical
issue and acted to develop the necessary programs to address these needs.
Our first step was to leverage federal investment opportunities. In 2001,
with nine partner organizations around the state, we developed programs,
tools, and training workshops that educated companies on how to access
Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) funds. Each year, the ten largest
federal agencies make more than $1.5 billion available to small businesses.
WTC’s program provides easy access to SBIR information and assistance
to companies that apply.
Our second step was to create the WTC Angel Network. This program, funded
in part by the U.S. Economic Development Administration, is increasing
the investment pool by encouraging investors from around the state
to participate.
The program consists of a network of angel groups forming around the
state in areas such as the Olympic Peninsula, Wenatchee, Tri-Cities,
and Bellingham.
By joining this network, these angel investors will realize benefits
similar to larger angel groups.
Realizing that access to investors is critical for growth, WTC has also
partnered with the Washington State Investment Board to make a portion
of their private equity portfolio available to companies within the state.
This program makes it significantly easier for our local companies to
gain an initial review of their business plan by one of WSIB’s 87
general partners.
WTC supports the efforts of the Washington State Legislature, which last
year created the Investing in Innovation fund. This legislation creates
the mechanism for investment in proof-of-concept and early stage product
development that can be especially helpful to the biotech industry.
In addition, the Seattle/King County Economic Development Council has
launched a project to determine how a biotech seed fund might be created
within the state. The Explore Life initiative is, in part, dedicated to
developing private funding for early stage proof-of-concept projects.
These and the other efforts to increase the available capital must be
encouraged. Effectively addressing challenge one means increasing the
number of financing options for our companies.
Challenge #2: Expand and renew our infrastructure.
It is safe to say that the biotech industry is driven by the skill and
knowledge of its people. In the early stages of the industry’s evolution,
those people are researchers and entrepreneurs. As the industry matures,
the manufacturing experts join in.
But these people need a place to work and develop their ideas. A place
that is different from the manufacturing, software or financial services
industries. For biotech this place includes wet laboratories, clean rooms,
and ultra-high speed computing and networks.
WTC operates a microfabrication user facility in the John M. Fluke Sr.
Hall, WTC’s headquarters. The MicroFabrication Laboratory represents
about $20M in facility and equipment investment. It provides critical
equipment and processing capability in a clean room environment for a
company’s product engineers and university researchers alike.
More than 25 companies are using this facility in their new product development.
Significant university research laboratories are also located in Fluke
Hall. As a result, Fluke Hall is a place where science and industry really
do rub shoulders.
Further development of appropriate facilities around the state is critical
for the growth of this industry. Research space for University of Washington,
Washington State University and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
must be increased. Facilities that allow entrepreneurs and our existing
companies to co-locate their commercial operations with these research
activities must be developed next.
Challenge #3: Position our region among other regions around the world
Make no mistake. This is a competition. We’re competing for talented
people, for money, for market access. We’re competing globally—against
the best from around the world.
Unlike biotech initiatives of a few years ago, regions today are more
focused and more selective. They are examining their strengths and defining
their niche in the biotech industry accordingly. We have world-class public
and private research institutions in our region. We are home to the world’s
leading non-profit foundation and program for global health. Leading medical
device and pharmaceutical companies are here. Our challenge, however,
is to describe our competitive edge when we consider these institutions,
and others, together.
Several efforts are underway to do just that. Through the support of
Senator Cantwell, WTC is leading an effort to develop such a vision and
strategy for micro- and nano-scale science and technology. With our partners,
PNNL, Avogadro Partners, and the National NanoBusiness Alliance, we are
working to ensure that this long term vision emerges. Its implementation
will establish our region as a leader by applying “small science” to
the discovery, production and marketing of diagnostic and therapeutic
devices and processes.
The Bio21 effort launched by Governor Locke last year is an important
component in meeting this challenge because it provides the backdrop required
to position and brand our region. It is our first concerted attempt to
develop a cohesive direction—21st Century Global Health—based
on our region’s strengths. As Bio21 is refined, I believe it will
prove to be the backbone from which many “implementation” initiatives
can draw their context. Existing programs, like the Investing in Innovation
Fund for proof-of-concept projects and WTC’s nanotechnology initiative,
are examples of programs that will implement the Bio21 principles.
Challenge #4: Engage everyone
Finally, I believe our most difficult challenge is how to position biotech
as an industry that has broad impact. Most people believe it’s just
for Ph.D. scientists and it won’t really affect their lives. No
doubt the biotech industry draws its ideas from the depths of research
in biology, chemistry, physics, computing and engineering. But just like
other industries, its greatest impact will only be realized when local
companies and their suppliers are making products and selling them.
At one point the aerospace industry probably faced this same issue. Aircraft
design, specialty materials, and complex electronics are all part of that
industry. Over the decades, however, the industry’s suppliers made
metal working and electrical subsystem manufacturing understandable and
hired thousands of people to fill those needs.
How to meet this challenge is yet to be discovered. But it is the transition
our biotech industry must make if we expect a similar impact to our region’s
economy.
By addressing these challenges, and others that may arise, Washington
Technology Center is prepared to contribute to solidifying our region’s
position as a global biotechnology leader.
|